Loan Deficiency in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 822
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $38,762,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Hughes Farm Partnership | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $231,601 |
42 | Williams Land Co | Widener, AR 72394 | $225,110 |
43 | Madison Farm Inc | Caldwell, AR 72322 | $221,892 |
44 | Riverdale Farms | Hughes, AR 72348 | $220,138 |
45 | West Blackfish Farms Inc | Hughes, AR 72348 | $215,246 |
46 | Stanley W Jones | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $211,584 |
47 | John Horton | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $211,378 |
48 | Bahama Farms Inc | Hughes, AR 72348 | $196,599 |
49 | Byron E Holmes Jr | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $196,279 |
50 | K & S Farms | Hughes, AR 72348 | $195,938 |
51 | Double H Farms Inc | Heth, AR 72346 | $194,044 |
52 | Wilkie Farms Inc | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $193,468 |
53 | M & S Partnership | Mc Crory, AR 72101 | $192,898 |
54 | Cottonwood Partnership | Brickeys, AR 72320 | $189,879 |
55 | Robert Tyrone Nash | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $188,606 |
56 | Delta Terre Planting LLC | Southaven, MS 38671 | $188,276 |
57 | Kiersky Goodwin Farm | Memphis, TN 38111 | $187,377 |
58 | C J Beasley And Sons 95 | Heth, AR 72346 | $186,170 |
59 | Huckaba Farms Partnership | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $182,518 |
60 | John Taylor Farms Partnership | Hughes, AR 72348 | $180,118 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”