Total Conservation Programs in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 329
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $10,105,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Denver Crisp | West Memphis, AR 72301 | $45,212 |
42 | Carl E Horton | Wynne, AR 72396 | $44,252 |
43 | Ambus J Handcock Jr | Caldwell, AR 72346 | $44,068 |
44 | Jerry W Wright | Widener, AR 72394 | $44,020 |
45 | Ernest Loewer Jr | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $42,971 |
46 | Ann Horton | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $42,382 |
47 | Williamson Brothers Inc | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $42,344 |
48 | Loyd Martin | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $40,886 |
49 | Nan Leiblong | Mcalester, OK 74501 | $39,725 |
50 | Luther Dave | Saint Louis, MO 63147 | $36,860 |
51 | Kiersky Goodwin Farm | Memphis, TN 38111 | $35,558 |
52 | Mathew W Lipscomb III | Lake Cormorant, MS 38641 | $33,824 |
53 | Thomas C Smith | Mount Vernon, AR 72111 | $32,984 |
54 | Fussell Graham Alderson | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $32,839 |
55 | Dale Horton | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $28,696 |
56 | Stephens Group Incorporated | Little Rock, AR 72201 | $28,484 |
57 | Kenneth M Spain | Cordova, TN 38016 | $28,019 |
58 | , | $26,998 | |
59 | Regina B Newson | Antioch, TN 37217 | $26,783 |
60 | Keith Howton Revocable Trust | Palestine, AR 72372 | $26,782 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”