Total Commodity Programs in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,961

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $360,119,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
41Mcgraw Planting Co A PartnershipPalestine, AR 72372$1,766,171
42Casey Farms PartnershipHeth, AR 72346$1,733,058
43Huckaba Farms PartnershipForrest City, AR 72335$1,714,354
44Thweatt Farms PartnershipPalestine, AR 72372$1,676,511
45Donnie Burns FarmsPalestine, AR 72372$1,672,230
46Byron E Holmes JrForrest City, AR 72336$1,646,806
47Otter Pond PartnershipWynne, AR 72396$1,598,392
48Sam Tracy Dillahunty SrHughes, AR 72348$1,547,395
49Daren Fowler FarmsWheatley, AR 72392$1,535,521
50Jayroe Farming PartnershipPalestine, AR 72372$1,519,627
51S And L Farms PartnershipMarion, AR 72364$1,516,929
52Double R Farms IncWheatley, AR 72392$1,516,483
53T & G Clegg Family Farms PtrColt, AR 72326$1,499,477
54J E Lindsey Family Limited PartneForrest City, AR 72335$1,434,261
55Walker Farms Ninety SixColt, AR 72326$1,411,393
56Johnny D WestHeth, AR 72346$1,385,564
57Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$1,383,605
58Caleb Jones FarmsPalestine, AR 72372$1,351,972
59Mccain Farms IncWidener, AR 72394$1,339,042
60Richard Branch Farms A PartnershiWynne, AR 72396$1,324,742

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag