Deficiency Payment in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 542
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $11,294,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Wilkie Farms Inc | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $64,488 |
62 | George Clegg | Colt, AR 72326 | $64,353 |
63 | Larry Clifton Farms | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $64,338 |
64 | Daren Fowler | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $64,271 |
65 | Larry & Michele Ives Farms | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $63,748 |
66 | Terry E Mcgraw | Palestine, AR 72372 | $61,356 |
67 | Dalton Weeks Jr | Palestine, AR 72372 | $61,331 |
68 | Ray Halbert | Palestine, AR 72372 | $61,102 |
69 | Gehring Farms Inc | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $59,238 |
70 | J & J Farms | Palestine, AR 72372 | $58,829 |
71 | C J Beasley & Sons 94 | Heth, AR 72346 | $58,794 |
72 | B J Michaelis & Sons Inc | Palestine, AR 72372 | $57,741 |
73 | Jerry W Wright Jr | Heth, AR 72346 | $57,690 |
74 | Tommy Dale Keeling | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $56,056 |
75 | Lonnie Carl Coleman | Goodwin, AR 72340 | $55,205 |
76 | Winding Brook Corporation | Kerrville, TX 78028 | $54,878 |
77 | Grant Williams Partnership | Widener, AR 72394 | $54,022 |
78 | Byron E Holmes Jr | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $53,771 |
79 | Woodson Hill Farms | Heth, AR 72346 | $51,482 |
80 | David Hill Farms A Partnership | Wynne, AR 72396 | $51,482 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”