Loan Deficiency in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 822
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $38,762,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Allen T Hopkins | Chicago, IL 60643 | $179,958 |
62 | Palmreed Incorporated | Marianna, AR 72360 | $178,684 |
63 | Double R Farms Inc | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $175,787 |
64 | Pat Bonds Farm | Hughes, AR 72348 | $174,331 |
65 | Mcgraw Planting Co A Partnership | Palestine, AR 72372 | $172,002 |
66 | Caldwell Planting Company Inc | Caldwell, AR 72322 | $166,483 |
67 | J & K Farms | Palestine, AR 72372 | $164,320 |
68 | Bfs Planting Co Ptr | Hughes, AR 72348 | $164,178 |
69 | Otter Pond Partnership | Wynne, AR 72396 | $161,750 |
70 | D & D Gore Farm | Palestine, AR 72372 | $160,065 |
71 | Larry Clifton Farms | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $159,365 |
72 | Mcgraw Planting Co A Ptr | Palestine, AR 72372 | $155,815 |
73 | B & G Farm Partnership | Heth, AR 72346 | $155,604 |
74 | T & G Clegg Family Farms Ptr | Colt, AR 72326 | $155,311 |
75 | David Fowler Farms A Partnership | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $147,403 |
76 | Holmon Kelley Jr | Hughes, AR 72348 | $146,167 |
77 | Henry Lee Davis | Hughes, AR 72348 | $145,580 |
78 | Robert Mcbride | Garden Grove, CA 92840 | $144,412 |
79 | Rodney Hicks | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $144,044 |
80 | Two Rivers Farms | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $143,808 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”