Farm Subsidy information

Saint Francis County, Arkansas

Total Subsidies in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,147

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $470,982,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
81Michaelis Farms PartnershipPalestine, AR 72372$1,176,897
82Circle S FarmsHeth, AR 72346$1,175,536
83Ives BrothersHot Springs, AR 71913$1,156,541
84Lindsey Sweet Potatoe Farm IncCaldwell, AR 72322$1,101,267
85J & K FarmsPalestine, AR 72372$1,083,243
86Forrwin Farms PartnershipWynne, AR 72396$1,074,352
87Larry Clifton FarmsWheatley, AR 72392$1,068,157
88Vaughan Farms Joint VentureWheatley, AR 72392$1,049,713
89Brian Mcdaniel Farms PartnershipForrest City, AR 72335$1,030,968
90Mulberry Planting CompanyPalestine, AR 72372$1,029,041
91Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$1,014,511
92Leslie T Brown FarmsBrinkley, AR 72021$1,009,192
93Ducks UnlimitedBismarck, ND 58503$1,007,998
94Focus Bank **Charleston, MO 63834$1,004,194
95C J Beasley And Sons 95Heth, AR 72346$974,181
96Marty & Sylvia Heustess FarmsForrest City, AR 72335$967,256
97Tommy Wayne KeelingForrest City, AR 72335$967,171
98Alvertis GatlinPalestine, AR 72372$963,948
99M & S PartnershipMc Crory, AR 72101$953,726
100Country Road PartnershipPalestine, AR 72372$934,350

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag