Total Commodity Programs in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 317
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $1,350,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Tracy A Bridges | Leesburg, GA 31763 | $3,750 |
82 | L & P Farms Partnership | Hughes, AR 72348 | $3,596 |
83 | R E Cox Sr Family Trust | Osceola, AR 72370 | $3,576 |
84 | Smith Ark Farms 03 | Jonesboro, AR 72401 | $3,540 |
85 | June Ivy LLC | Marion, AR 72364 | $3,493 |
86 | Alice Ramsey | Clinton, IL 61727 | $3,462 |
87 | Jessamine Yocum | Little Rock, AR 72227 | $3,436 |
88 | University Of Arkansas | Fayetteville, AR 72704 | $3,433 |
89 | Michael W Bradley | Heth, AR 72346 | $3,365 |
90 | Wright Land Co Inc | Widener, AR 72394 | $3,330 |
91 | Hugh Jarratt | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $3,293 |
92 | Joe Jarratt | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $3,293 |
93 | , | $3,153 | |
94 | Parsley Investments Limited Partership | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $3,108 |
95 | Marty & Sylvia Heustess Farms | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $3,082 |
96 | Mr Bobby Joe Billingsley | Elaine, AR 72333 | $2,848 |
97 | Jason Long | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $2,768 |
98 | Shull Family Limited Partnership | North Little Rock, AR 72116 | $2,692 |
99 | Three Creeks Of Sfc Ltd Ptr | Colt, AR 72326 | $2,677 |
100 | Billy C Adams | De Witt, AR 72042 | $2,666 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”