Market Gains in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 189
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $9,279,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Reid Eric Weber | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $9,998 |
102 | Bramucci & Son | Earle, AR 72331 | $9,344 |
103 | Annie Huckaba | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $9,335 |
104 | M & S Partnership | Mc Crory, AR 72101 | $9,295 |
105 | Trailback Farms Incorporated | Hughes, AR 72348 | $8,999 |
106 | J & J Farms C/o Jerry Henry | Cabot, AR 72023 | $8,824 |
107 | Gehring Farms Partnership | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $8,806 |
108 | Rebecca Marie Edgar | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $8,585 |
109 | Casey Farms Ptr 94 | Heth, AR 72346 | $8,153 |
110 | Joe & Brooks Melvin Farms Ptr | Hunter, AR 72074 | $8,137 |
111 | Leslie T Brown Farms | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $7,947 |
112 | Circle S Farms | Heth, AR 72346 | $7,851 |
113 | Huckaba Farms Inc | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $7,839 |
114 | Tyrone & Sonia Nash | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $7,673 |
115 | Winifred S. Tombaugh Estate | Pontiac, IL 61764 | $7,328 |
116 | J & K Farms | Palestine, AR 72372 | $7,252 |
117 | Andrea S Hartley | Pine Bluff, AR 71603 | $7,179 |
118 | Belle Terra Inc | Proctor, AR 72376 | $6,840 |
119 | Gene Harris | Colt, AR 72326 | $6,771 |
120 | Languille Farms General Partnersh | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $6,724 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”