Conservation Reserve Program in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 191
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $8,422,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Brent Howton | Palestine, AR 72372 | $3,933 |
142 | Dustin Ray Reeves | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $3,919 |
143 | Barbara Caudle Revocable Trust | Colt, AR 72326 | $3,858 |
144 | Brenda D. Adamson | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $3,828 |
145 | Enrico Edjar Hines | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $3,803 |
146 | Helen E. Dunn | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $3,300 |
147 | Edward M Grant | Colt, AR 72326 | $3,140 |
148 | David A Armstrong | Wynne, AR 72396 | $3,095 |
149 | Homer Towns | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $3,090 |
150 | Edward P Hammons | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $3,023 |
151 | Jimmy R Shull Revocable Trust | North Little Rock, AR 72116 | $2,891 |
152 | T & G Clegg Family Farms Ptr | Colt, AR 72326 | $2,698 |
153 | J T Higgins Jr | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $2,655 |
154 | Kathryn V Stewart Estate | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $2,549 |
155 | Unknown Miles | Stockbridge, GA 30281 | $2,310 |
156 | Warren Green | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $2,160 |
157 | John R May | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $2,128 |
158 | David L Thomas | Wynne, AR 72396 | $2,081 |
159 | Walter C Nimocks | San Antonio, TX 78258 | $1,940 |
160 | Clarence Smith | Palestine, AR 72372 | $1,869 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”