Oilseed Program in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 500
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $2,029,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cecil Farms Partnership | Parkin, AR 72373 | $51,760 |
2 | Trail Partnership | Widener, AR 72394 | $47,429 |
3 | Vaughan Farms Joint Venture | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $35,243 |
4 | J P Lofton Farms Partnership | Hughes, AR 72348 | $33,915 |
5 | Eubanks & Eubanks Partnership | Proctor, AR 72376 | $33,034 |
6 | Heritage Farms A General Partners | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $31,186 |
7 | Norsworthy Partnership | Widener, AR 72394 | $30,167 |
8 | Fogg Farms | Heth, AR 72346 | $29,662 |
9 | University Of Arkansas | Fayetteville, AR 72704 | $29,080 |
10 | John Taylor Farms Inc | Hughes, AR 72348 | $28,675 |
11 | Casey Farms Partnership | Heth, AR 72346 | $28,208 |
12 | Trailback Farms Incorporated | Hughes, AR 72348 | $26,550 |
13 | Herbert Stratton | Wynne, AR 72396 | $25,376 |
14 | Bradley Farms Partnership | Heth, AR 72346 | $24,728 |
15 | John Horton | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $24,208 |
16 | Wilkie Farms Inc | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $23,823 |
17 | Bahama Farms Inc | Hughes, AR 72348 | $23,023 |
18 | New Hope Farm Co | Hughes, AR 72348 | $22,342 |
19 | J T Jarrett & Sons | Colt, AR 72326 | $22,026 |
20 | West Blackfish Farms Inc | Hughes, AR 72348 | $21,267 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>