Conservation Reserve Program in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 191
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $8,422,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | University Of Arkansas | Fayetteville, AR 72704 | $1,311,224 |
2 | L'anguille Club LLC | Marion, AR 72364 | $557,024 |
3 | Roberts Management Co Inc | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $474,142 |
4 | Wright Land Co Inc | Widener, AR 72394 | $439,354 |
5 | John Horton | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $363,015 |
6 | S & S Heth Farms Inc | Heth, AR 72346 | $316,746 |
7 | Billy Thomas | Wynne, AR 72396 | $315,387 |
8 | W J Trail Jr | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $254,777 |
9 | Vpc Inc | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $218,205 |
10 | Three Creeks Of Sfc Ltd Ptr | Colt, AR 72326 | $205,393 |
11 | Betty Baker | Rockledge, FL 32955 | $171,945 |
12 | Billy Wayne Thomas Estate | Hernando, MS 38632 | $169,051 |
13 | Fishing Lake Farms Ptr | West Memphis, AR 72303 | $163,278 |
14 | James S Taylor | Wynne, AR 72396 | $140,012 |
15 | Taylor Brothers | Jonesboro, AR 72401 | $125,354 |
16 | Samuel C Hubbard | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $122,638 |
17 | Otto W Hess Jr | Colt, AR 72326 | $109,167 |
18 | L'anguille Farms LLC | Atlanta, GA 30345 | $94,662 |
19 | V Snowden Armstrong | Cincinnati, OH 45246 | $79,504 |
20 | S Q S Investment C/o Michael Quez | Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 | $76,860 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>