Direct Payment Program in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,179
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $87,053,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | G & L Farms | Hughes, AR 72348 | $725,822 |
22 | Anderson Farms | Heth, AR 72346 | $722,024 |
23 | Red Oak Farms | Wynne, AR 72396 | $709,191 |
24 | Heritage Farms Partnership | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $658,293 |
25 | Jessland Plantation | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $653,600 |
26 | Eubanks & Eubanks Partnership | Proctor, AR 72376 | $649,773 |
27 | D & L Loewer | Marianna, AR 72360 | $648,302 |
28 | Jumper Partnership | Palestine, AR 72372 | $645,952 |
29 | Whittenton Farms Partnership | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $637,552 |
30 | Jackson Farms Ptr | Colt, AR 72326 | $626,709 |
31 | Thweatt Farms Partnership | Palestine, AR 72372 | $604,244 |
32 | Two Rivers Ag | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $583,284 |
33 | L & J Farms Partnership | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $571,579 |
34 | J P Lofton Farms Partnership | Hughes, AR 72348 | $562,720 |
35 | R & V Hall Partnership | Palestine, AR 72372 | $557,827 |
36 | Daren Fowler Farms | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $534,601 |
37 | Keeling Farms Family Partnership | Colt, AR 72326 | $515,609 |
38 | Woodson Hill Farms | Heth, AR 72346 | $485,807 |
39 | Otter Pond Partnership | Wynne, AR 72396 | $482,224 |
40 | Donnie Burns Farms | Palestine, AR 72372 | $479,764 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”