Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 48
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $442,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Charles Roy Adamson | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $4,077 |
22 | George L Cochran Sr | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $4,047 |
23 | Burl H Downey | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $3,866 |
24 | Harvey L Turner Sr | West Memphis, AR 72303 | $3,725 |
25 | Louise Fletcher | Widener, AR 72394 | $2,974 |
26 | Jesse E Mcfadden | Colt, AR 72326 | $2,800 |
27 | Harold Gore Farm | Palestine, AR 72372 | $2,734 |
28 | Oretha Ray | Palestine, AR 72372 | $2,640 |
29 | Grover E Gunn III | Jackson, TN 38303 | $2,458 |
30 | Edgar Lindsey Gunn | Oxford, MS 38655 | $2,457 |
31 | Michael Scott Gunn | Plano, TX 75024 | $2,457 |
32 | T & G Clegg Family Farms Ptr | Colt, AR 72326 | $2,455 |
33 | Donald W Ellis | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $1,898 |
34 | Henry Jones Jr | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $1,739 |
35 | Thomas Beene Farms Inc | Hughes, AR 72348 | $1,486 |
36 | Jeff Able | Earle, AR 72331 | $1,433 |
37 | C J Beasley And Sons 95 | Heth, AR 72346 | $1,410 |
38 | Rodney D Kelso | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $1,398 |
39 | Alvertis Gatlin | Palestine, AR 72372 | $1,346 |
40 | Garry & Bonnie Graham Farms | Marianna, AR 72360 | $1,332 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”