Total Commodity Programs in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 447
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $27,996,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Regions Bank ** | Grenada, MS 38901 | $198,758 |
42 | Wheatley Farm Inc | Hot Springs, AR 71913 | $187,120 |
43 | Johnny D West | Heth, AR 72346 | $172,460 |
44 | Walker Farms Ninety Six | Colt, AR 72326 | $170,115 |
45 | Faith-grace Farms LLC | Marion, AR 72364 | $165,372 |
46 | Byron E Holmes Jr | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $165,269 |
47 | Henry Dale Jayroe Farms | Palestine, AR 72372 | $159,236 |
48 | Fidelity National Bank ** | West Memphis, AR 72303 | $157,469 |
49 | Thweatt Farms Partnership | Palestine, AR 72372 | $150,267 |
50 | Fogg Farms | Heth, AR 72346 | $150,099 |
51 | Mccain Farms Land Management Partnership | Widener, AR 72394 | $145,801 |
52 | Bernard Blackfish Farms | Hughes, AR 72348 | $142,954 |
53 | Bancorp South Bank ** | Paragould, AR 72450 | $142,628 |
54 | Wright Land Co Inc | Widener, AR 72394 | $138,869 |
55 | Justin Jarrett Farms | Colt, AR 72326 | $138,027 |
56 | Mulberry Planting Company | Palestine, AR 72372 | $134,648 |
57 | Double H Farms Inc | Heth, AR 72346 | $131,912 |
58 | R W Farms Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $131,399 |
59 | Darrow C Linn | Moro, AR 72368 | $130,344 |
60 | David Fowler Farms A Partnership | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $127,214 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”