Total Commodity Programs in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 203
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $773,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ryan Carey Farm | Marion, AR 72364 | $28,690 |
2 | D & D Gore Farm | Palestine, AR 72372 | $28,685 |
3 | S And L Farms Partnership | Marion, AR 72364 | $28,453 |
4 | G & L Farms | Hughes, AR 72348 | $27,985 |
5 | Jessland Plantation | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $24,507 |
6 | R & V Hall Partnership | Palestine, AR 72372 | $23,030 |
7 | Blaylock Farms Partnership | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $22,529 |
8 | Brian Mcdaniel Farms Partnership | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $21,875 |
9 | Carey Farms Partnerhsip | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $21,341 |
10 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $21,076 |
11 | Whittenton Farms Partnership | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $21,027 |
12 | Mcdaniel Farms | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $20,996 |
13 | B & G Farm Partnership | Heth, AR 72346 | $20,633 |
14 | Anderson Farms | Heth, AR 72346 | $19,591 |
15 | Turnrows Joint Venture | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $18,559 |
16 | Marty & Sylvia Heustess Farms | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $18,034 |
17 | Weeks Farm | Widener, AR 72394 | $16,753 |
18 | Caleb Jones Farms | Palestine, AR 72372 | $16,314 |
19 | Wayne Loewer Farms | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $15,381 |
20 | Forrwin Farms Partnership | Wynne, AR 72396 | $12,696 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>