Total Commodity Programs in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,961

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $360,119,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
1Trail PartnershipWidener, AR 72394$10,184,267
2J T Jarrett & SonsColt, AR 72326$5,627,474
3Fnb Of Eastern Arkansas **Forrest City, AR 72335$5,565,195
4Jessland PlantationForrest City, AR 72335$5,286,742
5Heritage Farms A General PartnersForrest City, AR 72336$4,265,573
6Melvin Farms PartnershipHunter, AR 72074$4,074,630
7Fogg FarmsHeth, AR 72346$3,956,376
8David Fowler Farms A PartnershipWheatley, AR 72392$3,909,478
9Whittenton Farms PartnershipForrest City, AR 72335$3,866,178
10Wayne Loewer FarmsBrinkley, AR 72021$3,764,293
11D & D Gore FarmPalestine, AR 72372$3,653,064
12Mcdaniel FarmsForrest City, AR 72335$3,624,876
13B & C Howton FarmsPalestine, AR 72372$3,031,439
14Norsworthy PartnershipWidener, AR 72394$3,023,690
15Weeks FarmWidener, AR 72394$2,936,327
16Jumper PartnershipPalestine, AR 72372$2,925,377
17Henry Dale Jayroe FarmsPalestine, AR 72372$2,834,725
18Cottonwood PartnershipBrickeys, AR 72320$2,711,095
19Williams FarmsVilonia, AR 72173$2,704,736
20B & G Farm PartnershipHeth, AR 72346$2,685,904

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag