Farm Subsidy information
Searcy County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Searcy County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,194
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Searcy County, Arkansas totaled $29,587,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | J W Hendrix | Marshall, AR 72650 | $62,015 |
122 | Leon Redman | Leslie, AR 72645 | $61,710 |
123 | Rosalee Taylor | Saint Joe, AR 72675 | $61,663 |
124 | Mark Woods | Saint Joe, AR 72675 | $61,422 |
125 | Shawn Ragland - Dba Ragland Farms | Marshall, AR 72650 | $61,128 |
126 | Phyllis Taylor | Tilly, AR 72679 | $60,744 |
127 | Steve Smith | Saint Joe, AR 72675 | $60,514 |
128 | Harold D Hendrix | Marshall, AR 72650 | $59,967 |
129 | Riley Butch Baker III | Saint Joe, AR 72675 | $57,930 |
130 | , | $56,961 | |
131 | Hudspeth Farms | Saint Joe, AR 72675 | $56,502 |
132 | James W Horton | Marshall, AR 72650 | $56,367 |
133 | Benny Holsted | Leslie, AR 72645 | $56,222 |
134 | Greg Ragland | Marshall, AR 72650 | $55,655 |
135 | Marcos Rivera | Witts Springs, AR 72686 | $54,996 |
136 | Boyce Bohannon | Marshall, AR 72650 | $54,777 |
137 | Omage Bolen | Marshall, AR 72650 | $54,363 |
138 | Roger Ratchford | Leslie, AR 72645 | $53,647 |
139 | Carrol J Ragland | Marshall, AR 72650 | $53,435 |
140 | Rudy Parks | Marshall, AR 72650 | $53,115 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”