Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Van Buren County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 325
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Van Buren County, Arkansas totaled $1,218,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | William Oliver Hinds | Clinton, AR 72031 | $2,090 |
142 | Doyle Tumbleson | Clinton, AR 72031 | $2,087 |
143 | Pamela Shelton | Scotland, AR 72141 | $2,087 |
144 | Cody Love | Scotland, AR 72141 | $2,087 |
145 | Mary Lawson | Jonesboro, AR 72401 | $2,035 |
146 | John R. Stripling | Bee Branch, AR 72013 | $2,035 |
147 | Katherine J Huggins | Shirley, AR 72153 | $2,024 |
148 | Lisa Kirk | Clinton, AR 72031 | $1,984 |
149 | Roger D Payne | Bee Branch, AR 72013 | $1,980 |
150 | Maurice Bonds | Clinton, AR 72031 | $1,980 |
151 | Harold Mahan | Damascus, AR 72039 | $1,980 |
152 | Shannon Hensley | Damascus, AR 72039 | $1,961 |
153 | Glynda Allen | Clinton, AR 72031 | $1,961 |
154 | Dan Payne | Bee Branch, AR 72013 | $1,961 |
155 | Jimmy D Berry | Fairfield Bay, AR 72088 | $1,925 |
156 | Cynthia Ferrell | Dennard, AR 72629 | $1,898 |
157 | Becky Hutchins | Damascus, AR 72039 | $1,898 |
158 | Kim Sumers | Clinton, AR 72031 | $1,870 |
159 | Marcia R Williams - Dba Williams Farm | Bee Branch, AR 72013 | $1,834 |
160 | Jakie Sue Pack | Jerusalem, AR 72080 | $1,815 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”