Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Van Buren County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 453
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Van Buren County, Arkansas totaled $4,579,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sequoyah Land And Cattle Co | Quitman, AR 72131 | $146,270 |
2 | Kenny Roberts Lee | Damascus, AR 72039 | $137,238 |
3 | Roberta Jean Hall | Damascus, AR 72039 | $89,323 |
4 | Donna K Pennington | Bee Branch, AR 72013 | $75,827 |
5 | Alan Mahan | Bee Branch, AR 72013 | $69,861 |
6 | Carolyn S Lee | Bee Branch, AR 72013 | $69,264 |
7 | Charles E Hall | Damascus, AR 72039 | $54,582 |
8 | Kevin Housley | Leslie, AR 72645 | $54,519 |
9 | Jim Holland | Bee Branch, AR 72013 | $51,167 |
10 | James Hart | Clinton, AR 72031 | $49,544 |
11 | Harold D Stark | Bee Branch, AR 72013 | $43,948 |
12 | Stephen Linkinogger | Scotland, AR 72141 | $43,052 |
13 | Palangio Cattle And Mineral Company | Damascus, AR 72039 | $41,536 |
14 | Carla Jeannine Caughron | Leslie, AR 72645 | $39,713 |
15 | Robin L Bramlett | Clinton, AR 72031 | $39,201 |
16 | Harry R Freeman | Tilly, AR 72679 | $38,892 |
17 | Robert A Staker | Quitman, AR 72131 | $36,671 |
18 | James Neil Hall | Clinton, AR 72031 | $36,151 |
19 | Margret Housley | Leslie, AR 72645 | $35,770 |
20 | Alex R Galligan | Clinton, AR 72031 | $34,505 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>