Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,096
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Arkansas totaled $34,280,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Midar Farms LLC | Prairie Grove, AR 72753 | $73,727 |
82 | David Sargent | Prairie Grove, AR 72753 | $73,291 |
83 | Thomas J Huls | Lincoln, AR 72744 | $73,141 |
84 | Howard P Goss | Hindsville, AR 72738 | $73,021 |
85 | Charles Michael Traylor | Prairie Grove, AR 72753 | $72,843 |
86 | Gilbreath Enterprises Inc | Summers, AR 72769 | $72,439 |
87 | Michael J Weaver | West Fork, AR 72774 | $71,876 |
88 | Robert R Daugherty | Fayetteville, AR 72703 | $70,804 |
89 | Ricky P Teague | Wesley, AR 72773 | $70,316 |
90 | Jimmy E Reaves | Farmington, AR 72730 | $70,121 |
91 | Cary L Bartholomew | Prairie Grove, AR 72753 | $69,954 |
92 | Nathan L Ogden | Prairie Grove, AR 72753 | $69,350 |
93 | James P Leach | Lincoln, AR 72744 | $68,804 |
94 | Jack Norton | Canehill, AR 72717 | $67,762 |
95 | Temple Cheri Moore | Prairie Grove, AR 72753 | $67,733 |
96 | Sandra Lee Bartholomew | Prairie Grove, AR 72753 | $67,258 |
97 | Jim Eastep | Tontitown, AR 72770 | $66,946 |
98 | Adam R Osburn | Hindsville, AR 72738 | $66,899 |
99 | Darrin S Burnett | Winslow, AR 72959 | $66,597 |
100 | Kert Marrs | West Fork, AR 72774 | $66,494 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”