Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 60
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in California totaled $8,661,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | C & E Farms Inc | Oxnard, CA 93030 | $169,407 |
22 | , | $159,108 | |
23 | Gratias Group Lp | Visalia, CA 93291 | $152,536 |
24 | Cloverleaf Ranch Co Ltd | Exeter, CA 93221 | $133,136 |
25 | Hoogendam Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $130,458 |
26 | Jed LLC Dba-river Edge Farms | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $120,625 |
27 | Martins Farm Lp | Modesto, CA 95358 | $120,610 |
28 | Marcella S Levitt George A Wais Doris C Sais Etal | Exeter, CA 93221 | $102,720 |
29 | O & S Holsteins Lp | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $86,389 |
30 | South Star Ranch Company Lp | Exeter, CA 93221 | $77,050 |
31 | Michael De Hoog Dairy, Lp | Ontario, CA 91762 | $72,002 |
32 | Rodoni Dairy Farms Lp | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $68,023 |
33 | Fiscalini Farms Lp | Modesto, CA 95358 | $60,538 |
34 | Outlaw Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $48,041 |
35 | Cmc Jerseys, LLC | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $46,921 |
36 | Jack Brothers Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $45,397 |
37 | Mid Valley Ranch LLC | Irvine, CA 92612 | $43,095 |
38 | Sultan Ranches LLC | Mecca, CA 92254 | $40,754 |
39 | Beachside Produce, LLC | Guadalupe, CA 93434 | $38,134 |
40 | Sierra View Dairy LLC | Tulare, CA 93274 | $35,274 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”