Dairy Programs in California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 888
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in California totaled $109,019,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Antonio Azevedo | El Nido, CA 95317 | $254,346 |
22 | Eugenio B Azevedo | Atwater, CA 95301 | $254,346 |
23 | Debbie M Azevedo | Atwater, CA 95301 | $254,346 |
24 | Alexandrina Azevedo | El Nido, CA 95317 | $254,346 |
25 | G J Silva Dairy Inc | Turlock, CA 95380 | $254,346 |
26 | Doornenbal Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $254,346 |
27 | Dennis Boertje & Son Dairy | Visalia, CA 93292 | $254,346 |
28 | Alexandre Dairy/alexandre Eco Dairy | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $254,346 |
29 | Frank Gwerder Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $254,346 |
30 | A & M De Sousa Dairy | Turlock, CA 95380 | $254,346 |
31 | Tony Cox And Family Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $254,346 |
32 | Jacobus De Groot Dairy 1 & 2 | Visalia, CA 93291 | $254,346 |
33 | Van Foeken Dairy | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $254,346 |
34 | Fontes Dairy Farms | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $254,346 |
35 | Alamo Farms | Keyes, CA 95328 | $254,346 |
36 | De Jager Dairy North | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $254,346 |
37 | Goyenetche Dairy No 2 | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $254,346 |
38 | Borba Dairy | Porterville, CA 93257 | $254,346 |
39 | Wesley Bylsma | Merced, CA 95341 | $254,346 |
40 | Monteiro Bros Dairy Inc | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $254,346 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”