Dairy Programs in California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 901
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in California totaled $9,546,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Andrea Mc Ree | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $31,472 |
22 | David Bakker | Visalia, CA 93291 | $31,355 |
23 | Paul Vanwarmerdam | Winton, CA 95388 | $31,355 |
24 | Paul P Lopes | Gustine, CA 95322 | $31,355 |
25 | Vander Schaaf Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $31,355 |
26 | Bidart Dairy II LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93389 | $31,355 |
27 | Flavio Almeida Martins Top Line Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $31,355 |
28 | Costa View Farms No 2 | Madera, CA 93637 | $31,355 |
29 | James C Schroer | Chico, CA 95928 | $30,963 |
30 | Joey Fernandes Dairy Dba Fernjo Farms | Tulare, CA 93274 | $30,062 |
31 | Doornenbal Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $29,940 |
32 | Tony Cox And Family Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $29,940 |
33 | Jessica Silacci Dba Jessbe Farm | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $28,432 |
34 | Silva Bros Dairy | Acampo, CA 95220 | $26,370 |
35 | Johnny Vogt Sr | Orland, CA 95963 | $25,035 |
36 | Leonardo Bros Dairy | Laton, CA 93242 | $24,257 |
37 | Henry Jongsma And Son Dairy | Orland, CA 95963 | $22,899 |
38 | Van Tol Dairy Number II | Orland, CA 95963 | $22,899 |
39 | Vogts Holstein Dairies No 1 | Orland, CA 95963 | $22,418 |
40 | California Dairy Farms LLC | Merced, CA 95341 | $22,318 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”