Dairy Programs in California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 847
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in California totaled $127,376,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Marvo Holsteins Dairy | Lakeview, CA 92567 | $339,715 |
22 | Carlos Echeverria & Sons | Bakersfield, CA 93313 | $337,503 |
23 | T & W Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $335,728 |
24 | Shein Ranch Dba South Point Ranch East | Madera, CA 93637 | $331,831 |
25 | Ramona Dairy, LLC | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $331,045 |
26 | , | $328,532 | |
27 | Alamo Farms | Keyes, CA 95328 | $325,639 |
28 | James J Stevinson Corp | Newman, CA 95360 | $321,792 |
29 | Capstone Ranch Lp | Madera, CA 93637 | $319,331 |
30 | Milky Way Dairy | Visalia, CA 93291 | $313,226 |
31 | K & J Fischer 2008 Family Trust- Kenneth Fischer | Ballico, CA 95303 | $309,555 |
32 | Legacy Ranches | Tipton, CA 93272 | $305,395 |
33 | Dos Rios Ranch Dba South Point Ranch West | Madera, CA 93637 | $303,371 |
34 | Robert Gioletti & Sons Dairy Inc | Turlock, CA 95380 | $302,544 |
35 | Four Star Dairy Lp | Tulare, CA 93274 | $302,352 |
36 | George Te Velde Jr - The Te Velde Survivor's Trust | Modesto, CA 95356 | $301,340 |
37 | Fontes Dairy Farms | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $301,096 |
38 | Dennis Boertje & Son Dairy | Visalia, CA 93292 | $298,139 |
39 | Hoekstra Dairy | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $296,337 |
40 | G & H Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $296,255 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”