Non-insured Disaster Assistance in California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,115
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in California totaled $13,126,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Spur X Livestock LLC | Livermore, CA 94551 | $87,329 |
22 | Darrell Wood | Vina, CA 96092 | $84,905 |
23 | Paul And Jeralyn K Favero Revocable Trust | Sacramento, CA 95864 | $83,816 |
24 | Tom Burrill | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $83,588 |
25 | Bidwell Ranches Inc | Hat Creek, CA 96040 | $81,796 |
26 | Cantua Creek Cattle Co | Hanford, CA 93232 | $78,317 |
27 | Macy Xiong | Fresno, CA 93722 | $76,768 |
28 | Fagundes Fagundes Fagundes | Merced, CA 95348 | $76,096 |
29 | Steve K Gorden | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $71,619 |
30 | Richard P O'sullivan | Paynes Creek, CA 96075 | $71,282 |
31 | Grant Leininger | Vina, CA 96092 | $69,699 |
32 | Jim Keegan | Williams, CA 95987 | $69,695 |
33 | Judy Parker | Williams, CA 95987 | $68,649 |
34 | Chance Land & Cattle | Ballico, CA 95303 | $68,590 |
35 | Ignacio Q Rodriguez | Mission Hills, CA 91345 | $68,010 |
36 | Roger Nicholson | Fort Klamath, OR 97626 | $67,504 |
37 | One Bar Livestock LLC | Williams, CA 95987 | $63,528 |
38 | Pearson Ranch | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $61,883 |
39 | Milano Land & Cattle Company LLC | Tehachapi, CA 93561 | $61,862 |
40 | Kent M Hirdes | Turlock, CA 95380 | $61,249 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”