Conservation Reserve Program in California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 132
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in California totaled $1,818,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | D-y Ranch General Partnership | Montague, CA 96064 | $24,889 |
22 | Paul W Ernst 2006 Revocable Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $23,616 |
23 | Mckee Family Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $22,774 |
24 | Ernst Family Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $22,620 |
25 | Garrett Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $21,855 |
26 | , | $21,855 | |
27 | Raymond And Cynthia Twisselman Re | Shandon, CA 93461 | $21,554 |
28 | , | $21,390 | |
29 | Michael K Crebbin LLC | Montague, CA 96064 | $20,865 |
30 | Glenna Gean Mainini | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $18,036 |
31 | Daniel A Mainini | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $18,036 |
32 | Frank D Kuhnle | Shandon, CA 93461 | $17,429 |
33 | Sutter Buttes Outing Club | Roseville, CA 95661 | $17,080 |
34 | Ian Irving Mcmillan II | Shandon, CA 93461 | $15,573 |
35 | Mcmillan Generation Skipping Trust | Shandon, CA 93461 | $15,572 |
36 | Raymond O Dauth 2014 Revocable Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $14,608 |
37 | G R Rhyne And Linda L Rhyne 1997 Revocable Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $14,608 |
38 | Theodore J Johnson | Montague, CA 96064 | $14,446 |
39 | Frederick Drayer | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $14,197 |
40 | Durst Home Ranch LLC | Capay, CA 95607 | $14,176 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”