Conservation Reserve Program in California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 109
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in California totaled $1,377,000 in in 2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Mckee Family Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $18,823 |
| 22 | , | $15,305 | |
| 23 | Kathryn Mckeon | Seattle, WA 98199 | $15,084 |
| 24 | Raymond O Dauth 2014 Revocable Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $14,608 |
| 25 | G R Rhyne And Linda L Rhyne 1997 Revocable Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $14,608 |
| 26 | Frederick Drayer | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $14,197 |
| 27 | C R Grant Ranch LLC | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $12,248 |
| 28 | Ben & Kelly Work Family Trust 2008 | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $11,876 |
| 29 | Hunewill Land & Livestock Co Inc | Wellington, NV 89444 | $11,643 |
| 30 | Paul W Ernst 2006 Revocable Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $11,572 |
| 31 | Roy & Dana Richards | Merced, CA 95340 | $11,310 |
| 32 | Robert J Laughlin Jr Separate Property Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $10,554 |
| 33 | Frank D Kuhnle | Shandon, CA 93461 | $9,912 |
| 34 | Timothy Testerman | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $9,829 |
| 35 | John Beck | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $8,485 |
| 36 | Glenna Gean Mainini | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $8,431 |
| 37 | Daniel A Mainini | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $8,431 |
| 38 | David Long | Zamora, CA 95698 | $8,299 |
| 39 | Scott Raven | Selma, CA 93662 | $8,044 |
| 40 | Charlyse Raven | Selma, CA 93662 | $8,044 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
