Dairy Programs in California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 901
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in California totaled $9,546,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Netto Ag Inc Double N Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $20,903 |
42 | Manuel R Goncalves Jr. | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $20,903 |
43 | Dennis Boertje & Son Dairy | Visalia, CA 93292 | $20,903 |
44 | Four Star Dairy Lp | Tulare, CA 93274 | $20,903 |
45 | G & H Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $20,903 |
46 | Carlos Echeverria & Sons | Bakersfield, CA 93313 | $20,903 |
47 | Frank And Carol Borba Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $20,903 |
48 | Alexandre Dairy/alexandre Eco Dairy | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $20,903 |
49 | Fontes Dairy Farms | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $20,903 |
50 | Alamo Farms | Keyes, CA 95328 | $20,903 |
51 | Art Leyendekker Dairy | Visalia, CA 93291 | $20,903 |
52 | De Jager Dairy North | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $20,903 |
53 | Frank Gwerder Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $20,903 |
54 | Roest Family Dairy | Turlock, CA 95380 | $20,903 |
55 | A & M De Sousa Dairy | Turlock, CA 95380 | $20,903 |
56 | Tri Palm Dairy | Visalia, CA 93277 | $20,903 |
57 | Raymond & Susanne Quaresma Dairy | Manteca, CA 95337 | $20,903 |
58 | Golden Star Dairy LLC | Caruthers, CA 93609 | $20,903 |
59 | Sozinho Dairy Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $20,903 |
60 | Soares Dairy Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $20,903 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”