Livestock Forage Disaster Program in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 5,274
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in California totaled $396,932,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jim Keegan | Williams, CA 95987 | $821,467 |
42 | Lazy Spade LLC | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $818,750 |
43 | Erik O Roen Family Trust U/a/d August 27, 2004 | Knights Ferry, CA 95361 | $818,128 |
44 | Jay S Dow Jr | Wendel, CA 96136 | $817,327 |
45 | John B Owens | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $806,656 |
46 | Mark Elworthy | Willows, CA 95988 | $793,587 |
47 | Rene Larranaga | Alturas, CA 96101 | $787,675 |
48 | Kent M Hirdes | Turlock, CA 95380 | $785,734 |
49 | Four J Cattle Corp | Bishop, CA 93514 | $774,871 |
50 | Joseph Lane Russ | Eureka, CA 95503 | $770,821 |
51 | Estill Ranches LLC | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $766,083 |
52 | Hamilton Brothers | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $765,390 |
53 | Simonin Livestock Gp | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $759,800 |
54 | Joseph M Murray Jr | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $758,189 |
55 | Roney Land & Cattle Co | Chico, CA 95973 | $756,050 |
56 | Richard Egan | Susanville, CA 96130 | $747,095 |
57 | Darrell Wood | Vina, CA 96092 | $743,923 |
58 | Romero Cattle Co LLC | San Jose, CA 95109 | $742,611 |
59 | Robben Cattle Co LLC | Dixon, CA 95620 | $742,295 |
60 | Neilsen Ranch Ptr | El Dorado, CA 95623 | $741,326 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”