Non-insured Disaster Assistance in California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,115
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in California totaled $13,126,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Twisselman Grain And Cattle | Shandon, CA 93461 | $59,488 |
42 | Kathy L Ferguson | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $58,940 |
43 | David Ferguson | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $58,940 |
44 | L Y 7 Company | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $56,374 |
45 | Geof Miller | Orland, CA 95963 | $54,674 |
46 | Midway Livestock | Livermore, CA 94551 | $54,028 |
47 | Avenales Cattle Co | Shandon, CA 93461 | $53,825 |
48 | Jose A Serrano | Royal Oaks, CA 95076 | $53,019 |
49 | Charles W. Kuhnle And Sons | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $51,156 |
50 | Grigory Ranch LLC | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $50,321 |
51 | , | $50,269 | |
52 | Coelho Ranches LLC | Modesto, CA 95358 | $48,738 |
53 | John R Ginochio III | Walnut Creek, CA 94598 | $48,429 |
54 | Hay Bros Sheep Co | Bakersfield, CA 93309 | $47,992 |
55 | Lazy A Cattle Company | Williams, CA 95987 | $47,565 |
56 | Lorrie Sheree Owens | Fort Klamath, OR 97626 | $47,315 |
57 | Robert Erickson | Merced, CA 95341 | $46,955 |
58 | Mcarthur Livestock | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $46,620 |
59 | Antelope Creek Cattle Co | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $46,409 |
60 | Rjn Inc - Dba H&n Enterprises | Pleasanton, CA 94566 | $46,151 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”