Total Conservation Programs in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 6,010
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in California totaled $184,644,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Maher F Habashi | Huntersville, NC 28078 | $541,821 |
42 | Ray V York | Montague, CA 96064 | $531,166 |
43 | Robert A Grant Jr Trust Dated Nov 5 2004 | Shandon, CA 93461 | $527,498 |
44 | Hickey Ranches Inc | Merrill, OR 97633 | $527,361 |
45 | Darrell Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $519,777 |
46 | Kelsey Ranch Lp | Snelling, CA 95369 | $518,584 |
47 | D A Rominger & Sons Inc | Winters, CA 95694 | $515,311 |
48 | Raymond O Dauth 2014 Revocable Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $513,394 |
49 | Paul W Ernst 2006 Revocable Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $500,521 |
50 | Sylva Bros | Montague, CA 96064 | $496,948 |
51 | Stacy Miller | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $495,633 |
52 | Work Family Estate Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $490,993 |
53 | Nic E Lewis | Pismo Beach, CA 93449 | $490,428 |
54 | Johansing Farms LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $483,992 |
55 | Mcdonald Ranch Partnership | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $476,450 |
56 | Cedric Grant | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $466,826 |
57 | Vineyard Hill | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $466,089 |
58 | Mitch Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $456,714 |
59 | Twisselman/clark | Shandon, CA 93461 | $453,724 |
60 | Donald E Furtado | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $453,454 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”