Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,486
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in California totaled $49,243,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Sundeep Dale | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $141,240 |
62 | Peninsula Farms LLC | Newport Beach, CA 92660 | $141,120 |
63 | Nilsson Farms Inc | Manteca, CA 95336 | $139,870 |
64 | Auburn Ravine Ranch Inc | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $136,878 |
65 | Bosman Dairy LLC | Tipton, CA 93272 | $136,653 |
66 | Sandridge Partners Lp | Los Altos, CA 94022 | $135,693 |
67 | Four Star Dairy Lp | Tulare, CA 93274 | $134,043 |
68 | Blue Sky Dairy Lp | Atwater, CA 95301 | $133,019 |
69 | Roy & Dana Richards | Merced, CA 95340 | $130,285 |
70 | Mattos Family Limited Partnership | Hanford, CA 93230 | $129,310 |
71 | Artois, LLC | Chico, CA 95928 | $127,186 |
72 | Dale Ranches | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $126,581 |
73 | Strain Farming Company Lp | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $125,750 |
74 | Saab A California General Partnership | Caruthers, CA 93609 | $125,074 |
75 | Gjc Dairy, Inc. | Turlock, CA 95380 | $123,862 |
76 | Omt Pistachios, Lp | Fresno, CA 93704 | $123,638 |
77 | Le Moore Holdings II LLC | Encino, CA 91316 | $120,341 |
78 | Five Dot Land & Cattle Co | Standish, CA 96128 | $116,936 |
79 | Outlaw Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $115,440 |
80 | Charanjit Singh Bath | Fresno, CA 93725 | $114,242 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”