Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 290
Recipients of Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) from farms in California totaled $1,177,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | William E & Ernesteen J Ferry 199 | Woodlake, CA 93286 | $7,309 |
62 | Martin Morgan | Stockton, CA 95203 | $7,275 |
63 | Andrew Munn | Orange Cove, CA 93646 | $6,602 |
64 | Merritt Erickson | Orland, CA 95963 | $6,590 |
65 | Dambrosio & Treichel Farms | Orosi, CA 93647 | $6,524 |
66 | Kaycee Farms | Visalia, CA 93292 | $6,436 |
67 | Ron Lopopolo | Fresno, CA 93727 | $6,362 |
68 | Shaw Ranch | Orland, CA 95963 | $6,084 |
69 | Schiro Ranch | Visalia, CA 93277 | $6,044 |
70 | Brian Peterman | Clinton, WA 98236 | $5,997 |
71 | Steve Shepherd | Woodlake, CA 93286 | $5,839 |
72 | Randall B Redfield | Visalia, CA 93277 | $5,825 |
73 | Greg Childress | Porterville, CA 93257 | $5,766 |
74 | C P G Ranch | Porterville, CA 93257 | $5,766 |
75 | Craig Munger | Tampa, FL 33634 | $5,735 |
76 | J A Fischer | Visalia, CA 93292 | $5,304 |
77 | Tri Mont Farms | Visalia, CA 93291 | $5,265 |
78 | Gm Foster & Ec Foster Family Trus | Woodlake, CA 93286 | $5,213 |
79 | Evan Peterman | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $5,182 |
80 | Brooke Peterman | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $5,182 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”