Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 8,432
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in California totaled $91,624,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tollenaar Holsteins | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $85,744 |
62 | Lazy Jt Land And Cattle Lp | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $85,664 |
63 | El Tejon Sheep Co | Bakersfield, CA 93380 | $85,086 |
64 | Timothy Wellman | Birds Lndg, CA 94585 | $84,900 |
65 | Menefee Hill Ranch Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $84,203 |
66 | William & Doris Mouren Revocable | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $84,005 |
67 | Doornenbal Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $83,993 |
68 | Tony Mello | Galt, CA 95632 | $83,885 |
69 | Lakeview Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $82,868 |
70 | Everett Luiz & Sons Dairy Inc | Lodi, CA 95242 | $82,543 |
71 | John L Parson | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $81,824 |
72 | Fagundes Dairy | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $81,801 |
73 | Williams Livestock LLC | Buellton, CA 93427 | $81,136 |
74 | Miller Bros Cattle Gp | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $80,974 |
75 | Fort Baker Ranch Co | Kneeland, CA 95549 | $80,750 |
76 | Creekside Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $80,263 |
77 | Alewyn Family Trust Dairy | Ontario, CA 91762 | $80,000 |
78 | Vander Schaaf Dairy | Escalon, CA 95320 | $80,000 |
79 | Helen Mebane | Bakersfield, CA 93380 | $80,000 |
80 | Juan Amparan | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $79,930 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”