Environmental Quality Incentives Program in California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,060

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in California totaled $42,508,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
61Rancho Dos HermanosCalipatria, CA 92233$79,472
62Alan L DejongNewberry Springs, CA 92365$78,838
63F And T Farms 2Fresno, CA 93710$75,877
64Wegis RanchBakersfield, CA 93308$75,826
65Don EmanuelliBrawley, CA 92227$75,750
66Johnson FarmsWalhalla, ND 58282$75,689
67Joe Da Silva - Joe Da Silva And AEscalon, CA 95320$75,570
68Buttonwillow Land And Cattle CoButtonwillow, CA 93206$75,166
69Madeline KuhnEl Centro, CA 92243$74,582
70Daniel G Chin Dba Chin FarmsKlamath Falls, OR 97603$73,396
71Cheri A FreyTulelake, CA 96134$72,285
72Boghosian BrosFowler, CA 93625$72,270
73Zuckerman Heritage IncStockton, CA 95201$72,088
74Leroy Del Don JrPatterson, CA 95363$72,000
75Dores Dairy PtnStevinson, CA 95374$70,854
76Button & Turkovich, LLCWinters, CA 95694$70,461
77Tos Farms IncHanford, CA 93230$68,715
78Kenny & Andrew Watkins Farm PartnershipLinden, CA 95236$68,600
79Curtis L HolgersenLoleta, CA 95551$68,457
80Dolores SanfordGrass Valley, CA 95949$67,800

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag