Wool and Mohair Programs in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,055
Recipients of Wool and Mohair Programs from farms in California totaled $8,886,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wool and Mohair Programs 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | Indart Land & Livestock Inc | Clovis, CA 93619 | $52,865 |
| 62 | Martin Durritzague | Chino, CA 91710 | $51,762 |
| 63 | Phillip Esnoz | Shafter, CA 93263 | $51,005 |
| 64 | Edward A & Ian Anderson | Birds Landing, CA 94512 | $50,005 |
| 65 | Mcpherrin Sheep Co | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $49,161 |
| 66 | Albert J Erratchu | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $49,095 |
| 67 | Mitch Etcheverria | Dixon, CA 95620 | $48,702 |
| 68 | Yriarte Sheep | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $45,781 |
| 69 | Larralde Sheep Co | Bakersfield, CA 93308 | $45,733 |
| 70 | John B Estill | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $42,982 |
| 71 | Ben Ansolabehere Sheep Co | Bakersfield, CA 93307 | $42,284 |
| 72 | Ben Elgorriaga | Madera, CA 93637 | $41,949 |
| 73 | Eyherabide Sheep Co Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93306 | $41,851 |
| 74 | Narbaitz Brothers | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $41,831 |
| 75 | Jean Etchamendy | Bakersfield, CA 93308 | $41,409 |
| 76 | Ramon Arias Labato | Williams, CA 95987 | $39,608 |
| 77 | Sagardia Sheep Co % Mike Sagardia | Mendota, CA 93640 | $38,439 |
| 78 | Dominique Antchagno | Holtville, CA 92250 | $38,033 |
| 79 | Duncan Mccormack | El Macero, CA 95618 | $35,331 |
| 80 | Manuel Basterrechea | Sutter, CA 95982 | $34,866 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
