Miscellaneous Farm Programs in California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 184
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in California totaled $4,526,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Andrew Guiliano | Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 | $9,373 |
82 | Pacific Fishery Inc | Los Angeles, CA 90046 | $9,308 |
83 | Joshua Lewis | Fresno, CA 93730 | $9,198 |
84 | Tom Hart | Boulder Creek, CA 95006 | $8,719 |
85 | Scott James Edson | Oakland, CA 94605 | $8,615 |
86 | Aaron Michael Lloyd Dba Offshore 25 | Corte Madera, CA 94925 | $8,130 |
87 | Channel Islands Seafood Inc. | Santa Barbara, CA 93150 | $8,094 |
88 | Charca Fish Viii, LLC | Mill Valley, CA 94941 | $8,015 |
89 | Diving Charters Inc | Murrieta, CA 92562 | $7,853 |
90 | Mudshark Fisheries LLC | National City, CA 91950 | $7,847 |
91 | Noah Corp | Junction City, CA 96048 | $7,234 |
92 | Giuseppe Pennisi | Chico, CA 95973 | $7,185 |
93 | Thomas Bert Davi | Salinas, CA 93908 | $7,126 |
94 | Robert Monckton II | Guerneville, CA 95446 | $7,028 |
95 | Dion Dante | Santa Barbara, CA 93109 | $6,770 |
96 | George Paul Marler Jr | Lawndale, CA 90260 | $6,732 |
97 | John Marques | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $6,678 |
98 | Robert Gregory George | Dana Point, CA 92629 | $6,512 |
99 | David A Kemp | San Francisco, CA 94133 | $6,345 |
100 | Kenneth George Miller | Scotts Valley, CA 95066 | $6,296 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”