Non-insured Disaster Assistance in California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,115
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in California totaled $13,126,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | M And J French Ranch LLC | Hollister, CA 95024 | $36,947 |
82 | Daniel J Erickson | Snelling, CA 95369 | $36,806 |
83 | John B Owens | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $36,415 |
84 | Candace Owens | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $36,415 |
85 | , | $35,895 | |
86 | , | $35,895 | |
87 | David A Daley | Oroville, CA 95966 | $35,832 |
88 | Ryan Fitzpatrick | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $35,816 |
89 | Allen Gansberger | Catheys Valley, CA 95306 | $35,331 |
90 | Hafenfeld Ranch LLC | Weldon, CA 93283 | $34,701 |
91 | Drew Hill | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $34,647 |
92 | Bradley & Son Cattle, LLC | Durham, CA 95938 | $34,499 |
93 | Jose Quilo | Del Rey, CA 93616 | $34,375 |
94 | Jack Sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $34,219 |
95 | Ferrara Ranches Ltd Jv | San Jose, CA 95109 | $34,150 |
96 | Cantrelle Ranch LLC | Raymond, CA 93653 | $33,816 |
97 | Ronald Lagrande | Williams, CA 95987 | $33,578 |
98 | Robert Staley | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $33,415 |
99 | Justin Langer | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $33,162 |
100 | Connolly Ranch Inc | Tracy, CA 95378 | $32,560 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”