Farm Subsidy information
California
Total Subsidies in California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 9,127
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in California totaled $872,296,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Foppiano Ranch General Partnership | Linden, CA 95236 | $555,274 |
82 | Staunton Bros Partnership | Malin, OR 97632 | $551,790 |
83 | Western Skies Vineyards, LLC | Lakeport, CA 95453 | $551,437 |
84 | Costamagna Farms No 3 | Hanford, CA 93230 | $546,452 |
85 | Bwb Honey Co | Mentone, CA 92359 | $543,946 |
86 | Bz-bee Pollination Inc | Esparto, CA 95627 | $543,640 |
87 | , | $543,586 | |
88 | Gary Hughes | Fresno, CA 93730 | $541,889 |
89 | Duane Martin Livestock | Ione, CA 95640 | $541,655 |
90 | Old River Groves Lp | Exeter, CA 93221 | $541,427 |
91 | Youngstown Grape Distributors Inc | Reedley, CA 93654 | $541,196 |
92 | Toste Family Farms Lp | Kerman, CA 93630 | $538,578 |
93 | Costamagna Farms No 5 | Hanford, CA 93230 | $538,127 |
94 | Island District Inc | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $537,544 |
95 | Lacey Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $535,756 |
96 | Gilkey Five | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $535,657 |
97 | Cpr Farms | Fresno, CA 93725 | $535,502 |
98 | Dust Bowl Farms LLC | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $534,750 |
99 | , | $534,607 | |
100 | Shifflett Ranch & Vineyard LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $533,930 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”