Conservation Reserve Program in California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 132
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in California totaled $1,818,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Daun Family Trust | Gig Harbor, WA 98335 | $4,216 |
82 | Richard Smith | Palmdale, CA 93551 | $4,153 |
83 | Camany Family Trust | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $3,872 |
84 | Bertoni Family Revocable Trust- John Bertoni | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $3,530 |
85 | Michael Evenson | Petrolia, CA 95558 | $3,218 |
86 | Roland P Desfosses | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $3,217 |
87 | Donald C Brockhoff | Zamora, CA 95698 | $3,154 |
88 | M V Merritt Irrev Trust | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $3,151 |
89 | Mark Higgins | Adin, CA 96006 | $3,134 |
90 | Patti Powell | Davis, CA 95617 | $2,977 |
91 | Darrell Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $2,895 |
92 | Nola Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $2,895 |
93 | Newman Farms Inc | Woodland, CA 95695 | $2,864 |
94 | David Armer | Zamora, CA 95698 | $2,705 |
95 | Barbara Armer | Zamora, CA 95698 | $2,705 |
96 | , | $2,614 | |
97 | Alan May | Seiad Valley, CA 96086 | $2,584 |
98 | Cathie Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $2,501 |
99 | Rowland Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $2,501 |
100 | Lawrence Roy Loch Jones Revocable Living Trust | Macdoel, CA 96058 | $2,334 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”