Deficiency Payment in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 9,408
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in California totaled $194,279,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Larry Hansen Farms | Princeton, CA 95970 | $241,939 |
82 | Knowles Ranch | Durham, CA 95938 | $241,318 |
83 | Hatcher Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $240,857 |
84 | Cook Brothers | Williams, CA 95987 | $238,547 |
85 | Drew Mayfield & Bennett | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $237,297 |
86 | Knight Farms | Glenn, CA 95943 | $236,252 |
87 | A & M Farms | Chico, CA 95928 | $235,672 |
88 | Baker Creek Farms | Colusa, CA 95932 | $234,846 |
89 | Skinner Ranch Partnership | Chico, CA 95926 | $234,341 |
90 | D & J Jarrett | Williams, CA 95987 | $233,623 |
91 | Linneman Ranches | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $232,149 |
92 | Tariq & Aslam Khan Farms | Butte City, CA 95920 | $230,925 |
93 | Arch J Campbell Trustee A Partner | Alamo, CA 94507 | $230,252 |
94 | Robert & Jarol Farms | Auburn, CA 95603 | $229,572 |
95 | Knight Farms | Glenn, CA 95943 | $229,448 |
96 | Austin Lemenager Et Al 69 Ranch | Sutter, CA 95982 | $228,408 |
97 | Murphy Lake Farms | Woodland, CA 95776 | $227,731 |
98 | Victoria Farms | Colusa, CA 95932 | $226,425 |
99 | Chester E Rose & Sons | Richvale, CA 95974 | $225,592 |
100 | Minasian Minasian Trust Minasian Ptshp | Oroville, CA 95965 | $225,064 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”