Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 12,273
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in California totaled $477,993,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Iest Family Farms | Madera, CA 93637 | $430,301 |
82 | Joe Parreira Dairy | Stratford, CA 93266 | $430,294 |
83 | D & V Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $428,713 |
84 | Poso Creek Family Dairy LLC | Ontario, CA 91761 | $426,548 |
85 | Dykstra Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $422,603 |
86 | Rio Rancho 2005 Bryce Partnership | Blythe, CA 92226 | $420,527 |
87 | Bert Wilgenburg Flint Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $418,270 |
88 | Stokes Farms | Lodi, CA 95242 | $416,650 |
89 | Teixeira And Sons, LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $416,322 |
90 | Hettinga Farms | Pixley, CA 93256 | $410,905 |
91 | Boyett Farms Inc | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $404,355 |
92 | Bos Farms Lp | Tulare, CA 93274 | $404,348 |
93 | Klm Ranches Inc | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $404,293 |
94 | Sozinho Dairy Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $403,924 |
95 | J & M Farms | Acampo, CA 95220 | $401,716 |
96 | Double J Dairy | Visalia, CA 93291 | $401,406 |
97 | Capstone Ranch Lp | Madera, CA 93637 | $400,178 |
98 | Bidart Dairy II LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93389 | $395,687 |
99 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $394,061 |
100 | Fern Oaks Farms | Porterville, CA 93257 | $392,852 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”