Crop Disaster Assistance Program in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 16,678
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in California totaled $530,657,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Albert Vera | Culver City, CA 90230 | $300,208 |
102 | Laux Land Co Ltd | Porterville, CA 93257 | $299,035 |
103 | Elmac Industries | Willits, CA 95490 | $299,020 |
104 | Richard G Nicholas | Orange Cove, CA 93646 | $296,817 |
105 | Greenlee Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93313 | $295,840 |
106 | Mount Oso Fruit Company Inc | Tracy, CA 95304 | $294,420 |
107 | Miles Twede & Mcgowan Ranch | Hamilton City, CA 95951 | $294,360 |
108 | Philip Martin Farms | Tracy, CA 95304 | $294,303 |
109 | Deer Creek Heights Ranch | Porterville, CA 93257 | $293,150 |
110 | La Rocca Vineyard | Forest Ranch, CA 95942 | $293,031 |
111 | Muzio Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95215 | $291,667 |
112 | Camulos Farms | Piru, CA 93040 | $291,316 |
113 | Zapato Creek Farms | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $290,136 |
114 | H M Shea Co | Stockton, CA 95207 | $290,120 |
115 | Vereschagin Farms Inc | Orland, CA 95963 | $289,624 |
116 | Raminder S Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $287,821 |
117 | Marchini Farms | Stockton, CA 95206 | $286,208 |
118 | Harjinder Kaur | Nelson, CA 95958 | $284,991 |
119 | Rajkovich Brothers | Hollister, CA 95024 | $283,654 |
120 | Spaich Farms Inc | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $283,600 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”