Livestock Forage Disaster Program in California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,948
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in California totaled $32,786,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Lee Bailey | Janesville, CA 96114 | $68,148 |
102 | One Bar Livestock LLC | Williams, CA 95987 | $68,148 |
103 | Ryan Fitzpatrick | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $68,098 |
104 | Allen Gansberger | Catheys Valley, CA 95306 | $67,127 |
105 | John O Varian | Parkfield, CA 93451 | $67,076 |
106 | Sam Thompson | Bieber, CA 96009 | $66,661 |
107 | Frusetta Cattle Company | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $66,006 |
108 | Roy W Richards | Snelling, CA 95369 | $65,666 |
109 | Marvin G Cardoza | Lookout, CA 96054 | $65,471 |
110 | Gerig Land & Livestock LLC | Bieber, CA 96009 | $64,732 |
111 | Jon Wooster | San Lucas, CA 93954 | $64,028 |
112 | Hyder Hay Service | Terra Bella, CA 93270 | $63,822 |
113 | Lowe Cattle Co Inc | Chico, CA 95928 | $62,555 |
114 | Grigory Ranch LLC | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $62,358 |
115 | Lazy Jt Land And Cattle Lp | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $61,944 |
116 | David A Daley | Oroville, CA 95966 | $61,081 |
117 | Jim Keegan | Williams, CA 95987 | $60,527 |
118 | Daniel Kuiken | Volcano, CA 95689 | $60,148 |
119 | Shannon Bros Cattle | Terra Bella, CA 93270 | $60,133 |
120 | Dallice M Nuttall | Susanville, CA 96130 | $59,508 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”