Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 290
Recipients of Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) from farms in California totaled $1,177,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Don Stutsman | Exeter, CA 93221 | $3,675 |
102 | Enrique Robles | Exeter, CA 93221 | $3,603 |
103 | Aaron P Rysemus | Los Angeles, CA 90019 | $3,432 |
104 | Cleek Ranch Prop | Orland, CA 95963 | $3,340 |
105 | Karen Gleason | Biggs, CA 95917 | $3,241 |
106 | R B Orchards No 2 | Topanga, CA 90290 | $3,145 |
107 | Paul E Danielson | Woodlake, CA 93286 | $3,083 |
108 | Hanna Peterman | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $3,079 |
109 | David De Paoli | Strathmore, CA 93267 | $2,979 |
110 | David C Chambers | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $2,971 |
111 | Steve French | Orland, CA 95963 | $2,891 |
112 | Francisco Alvarado | Corning, CA 96021 | $2,851 |
113 | John Shelton | Los Osos, CA 93402 | $2,825 |
114 | Antonio Carini | Temecula, CA 92592 | $2,768 |
115 | Mr James A Weber | Orland, CA 95963 | $2,652 |
116 | Phil Mehl | Visalia, CA 93292 | $2,600 |
117 | Austin - Sherwood Partnership | Terra Bella, CA 93270 | $2,574 |
118 | Thomas Martinez | Mission Viejo, CA 92692 | $2,567 |
119 | Robert C. Gosnell | Los Osos, CA 93402 | $2,493 |
120 | William Matthew Koball | Corning, CA 96021 | $2,480 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”