Conservation Reserve Program in California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,343

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in California totaled $122,851,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
101Richard & Denise Morford Rev LivWoodland, CA 95776$317,421
102W R Land & Cattle CoRancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275$314,582
103Filipponi Family TrustCreston, CA 93432$311,179
104Jaureguy Land Trust Dated December 29 1995San Miguel, CA 93451$306,402
105Tejon Ranch CorpLebec, CA 93243$302,608
106Henry TwisselmanPaso Robles, CA 93446$301,006
107Cagliero Family Estate Trust FamiPaso Robles, CA 93446$299,807
108Elena Patricia Twisselman ClarkShandon, CA 93461$296,156
109Loren McwilliamsPaso Robles, CA 93447$294,721
110North Butte IncSan Carlos, CA 94070$293,373
111Frederick J DurstWoodland, CA 95695$291,777
112Wilson Ranches IncTempleton, CA 93465$289,863
113Martin Martin JaureguyPaso Robles, CA 93447$286,969
114Salinas Land & Cattle Inc.Salinas, CA 93902$285,363
115Klamath L & C IncSanta Cruz, CA 95060$279,059
116Adele Abele Giovannetti Rev Lvg TYolo, CA 95697$271,917
117Kenneth LauridsenPaso Robles, CA 93446$268,964
118Calli FarmsEsparto, CA 95627$268,282
119Chimineas LtdHouston, TX 77251$259,256
120Zena KlintworthPaso Robles, CA 93446$256,035

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag