Livestock Forage Disaster Program in California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,948
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in California totaled $32,786,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Greg Harlan | Clovis, CA 93611 | $59,319 |
122 | Lisa M Harlan | Clovis, CA 93619 | $59,319 |
123 | Bolin Farming Co LLC | Alamo, CA 94507 | $58,824 |
124 | Flynn Cattle Company Lp | Ducor, CA 93218 | $58,518 |
125 | Basin View Ranch LLC | Malin, OR 97632 | $58,210 |
126 | William C Ritts | Sonora, CA 95370 | $57,594 |
127 | Rancho San Julian Cattle LLC | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $57,156 |
128 | Jon Cooper | San Lucas, CA 93954 | $57,112 |
129 | Gardner & Gardner Ranch | Davis Creek, CA 96108 | $57,108 |
130 | Fort Baker Ranch Co | Kneeland, CA 95549 | $56,324 |
131 | Lazy A Cattle Company | Williams, CA 95987 | $56,302 |
132 | Rj Livestock LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $56,165 |
133 | Richard Mendoza | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $55,991 |
134 | Cubiburu Livestock Inc | Stockton, CA 95219 | $55,860 |
135 | Danette Carter | Woody, CA 93287 | $55,623 |
136 | Magruder Ranch LLC | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $55,121 |
137 | Estill Ranches Sheep Co LLC | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $54,757 |
138 | Fort Seward Ranch | Garberville, CA 95542 | $54,536 |
139 | White/grantham Livestock | Creston, CA 93432 | $54,492 |
140 | Scribner Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $54,366 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”