Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,499
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in California totaled $11,446,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Duane D Friesen | Dinuba, CA 93618 | $11,875 |
122 | Michelle - Dresick Living Trust Dresick | Huron, CA 93234 | $11,875 |
123 | Camilla A Wells | Westley, CA 95387 | $11,875 |
124 | Wendell J Naraghi | Escalon, CA 95320 | $11,875 |
125 | Satgur Singh Kahal | Madera, CA 93637 | $11,875 |
126 | Pakhar Singh Bains | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $11,875 |
127 | Daljit Hundal | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $11,875 |
128 | John A Fugazi | Linden, CA 95236 | $11,875 |
129 | James H Smith | Butte City, CA 95920 | $11,875 |
130 | Dominic De Palma | Ripon, CA 95366 | $11,875 |
131 | Ann Dresick Family Trust | Huron, CA 93234 | $11,875 |
132 | Larry A Bettencourt | Hanford, CA 93230 | $11,875 |
133 | Vincent P Martinazzi | Madera, CA 93637 | $11,875 |
134 | Edward A Machado | Ripon, CA 95366 | $11,875 |
135 | Earl Giacolini | Fresno, CA 93706 | $11,875 |
136 | Suneel Sharma | Dixon, CA 95620 | $11,875 |
137 | Surjit Singh Rahul | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $11,875 |
138 | Gerald W Neuwirth | Kerman, CA 93630 | $11,875 |
139 | Joel P Allen | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $11,875 |
140 | Kent M Kohler | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $11,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”