Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 6,084
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in California totaled $237,397,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | William J Mouren Farming Inc | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $254,129 |
142 | Soares Dairy Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $252,853 |
143 | Ernest Taylor Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $252,310 |
144 | Frank L Costa III | Visalia, CA 93292 | $252,196 |
145 | B D L Farms | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $251,062 |
146 | Whiteside Dairy | Wasco, CA 93280 | $251,034 |
147 | Schaupp Farms | Esparto, CA 95627 | $250,367 |
148 | Favier Farms | Atwater, CA 95301 | $248,745 |
149 | Lakeside Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $247,843 |
150 | Michael B And Deena O'banion | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $247,779 |
151 | Robert A Baley | Merrill, OR 97633 | $247,706 |
152 | Robert Hull Dba Tara | Blythe, CA 92225 | $247,192 |
153 | Boschma & Son Dairy | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $246,849 |
154 | Albert Goyenetche Dairy | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $246,393 |
155 | Iest Family Farms | Madera, CA 93637 | $245,364 |
156 | Wilson Ag | Shafter, CA 93263 | $245,280 |
157 | Hyder Hay Service | Terra Bella, CA 93270 | $245,012 |
158 | Greg Te Velde | Tulare, CA 93274 | $243,472 |
159 | Lacey Livestock | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $243,096 |
160 | Triple E Livestock & Land Co Inc | Visalia, CA 93279 | $242,626 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”