Environmental Quality Incentives Program in California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 3,060

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in California totaled $42,508,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
141Altman Specialty Plants IncLoxahatchee, FL 33470$50,000
142Yurok TribeKlamath, CA 95548$50,000
143Martins Family DairyOrland, CA 95963$50,000
144Elected Delegates Comm Of EcclesWillits, CA 95490$49,977
145Lafranchi RanchNicasio, CA 94946$49,835
146Dorothy J PerryBurney, CA 96013$49,835
147Indian Creek Land TrustCrows Landing, CA 95313$49,834
148Thomas David BrundySeeley, CA 92273$49,821
149Robert AndreHollister, CA 95023$49,324
150William M MosherElk Grove, CA 95624$49,311
151Jack Chapman SrMerrill, OR 97633$49,293
152Fred FisherTulelake, CA 96134$49,234
153John O VarianParkfield, CA 93451$49,229
154Frank Wyle Survivors TrustMarina Del Rey, CA 90292$48,651
155Tom MacyTulelake, CA 96134$48,513
156Harry H BakerOakhurst, CA 93644$48,395
157Tule Dux FarmsTulelake, CA 96134$48,300
158Antonio F DuraoCrows Landing, CA 95313$48,282
159Anthony JaquesTracy, CA 95304$48,139
160Nellie TakacsTulelake, CA 96134$47,961

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag